People v. McKinnon CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2024E080511California4,143 words

Opinion

Opinion

facts as follows: “[T]here was a sting operation days beforehand, and so the officers

recognized [defendant]. Two separate officers who were not involved in that

investigation were called out to a domestic violence, supposedly, type dispute. When the

officers came out and tried to talk to them, [defendant] started walking away

immediately. The officers started yelling, ‘Stop or I’ll shoot. Stop or I’ll shoot.’

[Defendant] started running.

“I’ll make this short, Judge. The police officer shot [defendant] in the back twice.

Once through the right thigh and once through his buttocks, and then hit his scrotum. So

this is as [defendant] is running away. The officer claims that [defendant] had a firearm

and there are witnesses to support that at the trial. There’s conflicting evidence. But, at

worst, what [defendant] did was he turned around with the gun. Officer never says he

cocked it. Officer never says that he saw [defendant] about to pull the tripper. [Officer]

3 Simultaneously with the filing of the respondent’s brief, the People requested judicial notice of the record in defendant’s appeal from the judgment (People v. McKinnon (Feb. 28, 2008, E040156, E040157)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.