People v. Krmpotic CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2024B328167California1,720 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baltodano, J.

Filed 7/1/24 P. v. Krmpotic CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B328167 (Super. Ct. No. 22CR08249) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Santa Barbara County)

v.

CURT JOSEPH KRMPOTIC,

Defendant and Appellant.

Curt Joseph Krmpotic appeals from the judgment after a jury convicted him of second degree robbery. (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 212.5, subd. (c).) The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Krmpotic on two years of formal probation. He contends the judgment should be reversed because the court should have declared a mistrial, and there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Early one morning in November 2022,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.