Salami

Salami v. Los Robles Regional Medical Center CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2024B327348California2,141 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baltodano, J.

Filed 7/1/24 Salami v. Los Robles Regional Medical Center CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

FARZAM SALAMI, 2d Civil No. B327348 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2021- Plaintiff and Appellant, 00560715-CU-BC-VTA) (Ventura County) v.

LOS ROBLES REGIONAL

MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendant and Respondent.

Farzam Salami appeals from the trial court’s orders sustaining Los Robles Regional Medical Center’s demurrers to claims in his first and third amended complaints (FAC and TAC, respectively) without granting leave to amend. Salami contends the court erred when it: (1) sustained the demurrer to the breach of contract and declaratory relief claims in his FAC after finding that Los Robles’s emergency services fee (EMS fee)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.