Z.C.

Z.C. v. Zhan CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2024H051499California1,211 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

Filed 7/1/24 Z.C. v. Zhan CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Z.C., H051499

(Santa Cruz County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 23CV01503)

v.

WEITING ZHAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Weiting Zhan, representing herself, appeals the issuance of a civil harassment restraining order against her. Zhan has not provided an adequate record or opening brief to enable meaningful appellate review. Accordingly, we affirm. It is well settled that a judgment is presumed correct and “ ‘error must be affirmatively shown.’ ” (Denham v. Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 557, 564.) For that reason, an appellant bears the burden of providing an adequate record. (Maria P. v. Riles (1987) 43 Cal.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.