Paula Hughes v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 202422-16285California899 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAULA HUGHES, No. 22-16285

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00541-MTL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 2, 2024**

Before: D. NELSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

Paula Hughes appeals pro se the district court’s order affirming the

administrative law judge’s (ALJ) decision denying her application for disability

insurance benefits and supplemental social security income under Titles II and XVI

of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423. We have jurisdiction pursuant to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1291.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.