Wallen Lawson v. Ppg Architectural Finishes, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 202422-56114California3,302 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 2 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WALLEN LAWSON, No. 22-56114
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:18-cv-00705-JVS-JPR v.
PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES, INC., MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 8, 2023 San Francisco, California
Before: COLLINS, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge FORREST.
Plaintiff-Appellant Wallen Lawson appeals the district court’s grant of
summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee PPG Architectural Finishes,
Inc. (“PPG”) on his claims for whistleblower retaliation under California Labor
Code § 1102.5 and common law wrongful termination. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review the district court’s decision de novo, Ochoa v.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. City of…