Fred Dardashti v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 202423-55191California1,094 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUL 2 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRED DARDASHTI, No. 23-55191

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-02002-SVW-MRW v.

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE MEMORANDUM*

COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 3, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH and BADE, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,** District Judge.

After an incident involving a water pipe caused water damage to Fred

Dardashti’s home, he filed a claim under his homeowners insurance policy (the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. “Policy”). His insurance provider, State Farm General Insurance Company (“State

Farm”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.