Howell
Law Office of Andrew S. Bisom v. Howell
United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20206:14-ap-01070California5,943 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
FILED & ENTERED
JUN 29 2020
4 C CL enE tR raK l U D. iS st. r B icA t N ofK CR aU liP foT rC nY ia COURT BY c a r g i l l DEPUTY CLERK
7
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RIVERSIDE DIVISION
In re: Case No.: 6:13-bk-29922-MH
15 NANCY ANN HOWELL Chapter: 7 16 Debtor Adv. No.: 6:14-ap-01070-MH
LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW S. BISOM & MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
EISENBERG LAW FIRM, APC ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 19 v.
NANCY ANN HOWELL
Defendant 22 23
25 26 27 I. Background & Undisputed Facts 2 In September 2006, Nancy Howell (“Defendant”) retained both the Law Office of Andrew S. Bisom and Day/Eisenberg1 (collectively “Plaintiffs”; individually “Bisom” and “Eisenberg”) to represent her in an action she had commenced against the Oso Valley Greenbelt Association (“HOA”) and two of its officers and/or directors. In the course of engaging Plaintiffs, and as a…