Chaparala

All In One Trading, Inc., a California corporation v. Chaparala

Good Law
United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20202:16-ap-01332California10,558 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN

corporation,

SUPPORT OF RENEWED MOTION OF

PLAINTIFF FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff, v. [NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY COURT]

RAMA KRISHNA CHAPARALA,

Hearings: 23 Date: March 10, 2020 and June 23, 2020 Defendant. Time: 2:30 p.m. 24 Place: United States Bankruptcy Court Edward Roybal Federal Building 25 255 East Temple St. Courtroom 1675 26 Los Angeles, CA 90012

27 // 28 Hearings were held before this court on March 10, 2020 and June 23, 2020 to consider the Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Partial Summary Adjudication Regarding Nondischargeability of Debt Under 11 U.S.C. § 523 [Adv. Docket No. 38] (the “Renewed Motion”) filed by plaintiff All In One Trading, Inc. (“All In One”) in the above- captioned adversary proceeding against defendant Rama Krishna Chaparala (“Chaparala”). Anthony J. Napolitano, Esq. of Buchalter, a Professional Corporation, appeared on behalf of All In One. No other parties appeared on the record. On May 30, 2019, the court entered its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.