Trivedi

Trivedi v. Poladyan

Good Law
United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 201918-02014California2,453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1

POSTED ON WEBSITE

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 In re ) Case No. 17-27397-E-13 ) GEVORG GEORGE POLADYAN and )

ARMINE ASATRYAN, )

) Debtors. ) ) ) TAPAN TRIVEDI, ) Adv. Proc. No. 18-2014 ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) GEVORG G. POLADYAN and )

ARMINE ASATRYAN, )

) Defendants. ) ___________________________________) This Supplemental Memorandum Decision is not appropriate for publication. It may be cited for persuasive value on the matters addressed. 20 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DECISION The trials in Adversary Proceedings 18-2130 and 18-2014 were concluded with the court stating it Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law orally on the record. Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a), Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7052. The trials for the two Adversary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.