Marshall
Oakhurst Lodge Inc. v. Marshall
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 In re: Case No. 11-17165-A-
OAKHURST LODGE, INC.,
8 Debtor.
JACK PATEL et al., Adv. No. 19-1055-A
Plaintiffs, DMS-
V. MEMORANDUM
STEVE MARSHALL et al.,
Defendants.
17 Argued and submitted on March 16, 2021 18 at Sacramento, California 19 Honorable Fredrick E. Clement, Bankruptcy Judge Presiding
21 Appearances: Donna M. Standard for Steve Marshall; Sharlene F. Roberts-Caudle, Glenn E. Gates 22 for Jack Patel, Justin D. Harris, Harris Law Firm, PC for Jack Patel, Sam Patel, 23 and Oakhurst Lodge, Inc.; Sheryl D. Noel for Sushila Desai and Shantilal Desai 24
26 27 A party who fails to respond to Requests for Admission admits
them. After the pretrial conference, relief may be granted only to
“prevent manifest injustice.” Under Oakhurst Lodge, Inc.’s Chapter
plan, Steve Marshall retained equity if he made “a $50,000 capital