Cabardo

Cabardo v. Patacsil

Good Law
United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 202320-02167California2,153 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

POSTED ON WEBSITE NOT FOR PUBLICATION 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 In re: Case No. 20-23457-A-

ERNESTO PATACSIL and MARILYN EMBRY

PATACSIL

9 Debtors. 11 JOSEPH CABARDO et al., Adv. No. 20-02167-A 12 Plaintiffs, 13 V. 14 ERNESTO PATACSIL et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19

MEMORANDUM

(Plaintiffs’ Evidentiary Objections, ECF No. 109)

27 Is a computer-generated representation of the witness’ name on an affidavit, even one initiated by the affiant, a signature? I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Patacsils interpose 102 objections to the eight declarations offered by the plaintiffs as the written direct testimony. Am. Scheduling Order § 1.0, 8.0, ECF No. 95. Each of the declarations were signed electronically, e.g., DocuSign, rather than manually by cursive handwriting; from that the defendants argue that the declarations are unsigned and, therefore, are inadmissible. Plaintiffs admit the signatures were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.