Cabardo

Cabardo v. Patacsil

Good Law
United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 202320-02167California3,887 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

POSTED ON WEBSITE NOT FOR PUBLICATION 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 In re: Case No. 20-23457-A-

ERNESTO PATACSIL and MARILYN EMBRY

PATACSIL

9 Debtor. 11 JOSEPH CABARDO et al., Adv. No. 20-02167-A 12 Plaintiffs, FEC-1 13 V. 14 ERNESTO PATACSIL et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19

MEMORANDUM

(Request for Judicial Notice)

25 26 27 A court may take judicial notice of the “documents filed in other courts, again not for the truth of the matters asserted in the other litigation, but rather to establish the fact of such litigation and related filings.” Kramer v. Time Warner Inc., 937 F.2d 767, 774 (2d Cir. 1991). Plaintiffs seek judicial notice of numerous filings in a related District Court action and unspecified “facts contained in these documents.” May the court do so? I. FACTS Prior to the matters that are now before this court, eight former employees, acting under the Private Attorney…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.