Cabardo
Cabardo v. Patacsil
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 In re: Case No. 20-23457-A-
ERNESTO PATACSIL and MARILYN EMBRY
PATACSIL
8 Debtor. 10 JOSEPH CABARDO et al., Adv. No. 20-02167-A 11 Plaintiffs, FEC-1 12 V. 13 ERNESTO PATACSIL et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18
MEMORANDUM
(Motion in Limine to Exclude Non-Percipient Witnesses)
27 Motion must state with particularity the relief sought. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7007(b)(1)(C). Defendants have lodged the direct written testimony of eight witnesses. By motion in limine, plaintiffs seek to exclude the testimony of witnesses that lack personal knowledge, Fed. R. Evid. 602. But they have not specified which of the declarations and/or other evidence to which they object. Should the court grant the motion? I. FACTS Prior to the matters that are now before this court eight former employees, acting under the Private Attorney General Act of 2004, brought an action against the…