Zhiry

Keena, II v. Zhiry

Good Law
United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 202322-02011California3,087 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

POSTED ON WEBSITE NOT FOR PUBLICATION 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 In re: Case No. 21-22759-A-

NADIA ZHIRY,

9 Debtor.

GERARD F. KEENA II, RECEIVER, Adv. No. 22-2011-A

Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM

V.

NADIA ZHIRY,

Defendant.

18 Argued and submitted on March 8, 2023 19 at Sacramento, California 20 Honorable Fredrick E. Clement, Bankruptcy Judge Presiding

22 Appearances: Kirk Rimmer for plaintiff Gerald F. Keena II; Peter G. Macaluso for defendant Nadia 23 Zhiry 24

27 11 United States Code 523(a)(7) excepts from discharge a debt “for a fine, penalty, or forfeiture” that is “payable to and for the benefit of a governmental unit.” The state court appointed plaintiff Keena receiver over defendant Zhiry’s property, which is a public nuisance. California law allows Keena is entitled to recover from Zhiry fees for services rendered and costs incurred. Is Keena entitled to except his debt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.