Tammy Marie Ogletree

INTRODUCTION

Creditor Sarah Davis appeals from the bankruptcy court’s order overruling her objection to debtor Tammy Ogletree’s chapter 131 plan. In particular, Ms. Davis objected on the ground that Ms. Ogletree’s proposed treatment of two properties located in New York State violated the best * This disposition is not appropriate for publication. Although it may be cited for whatever persuasive value it may have, see Fed. R. App. P. 32.1, it has no precedential value, see 9th Cir. BAP Rule 8024-1. 1 Unless specified otherwise, all chapter and section references are to the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532. interest of creditors test under § 1325(a)(4). She argued that, if the properties were liquidated, there would be sufficient funds to pay all of Ms. Ogletree’s unsecured creditors. The bankruptcy court overruled the

objection, and Ms. Davis appealed. We agree with the bankruptcy court that the chapter 13 plan did not violate the best interest of creditors test. We therefore AFFIRM.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND2

A. Prepetition events Ms. Ogletree, Ms. Davis, and Chadwick Greer were members of Eat Earth LLC, which operated a restaurant in Santa Cruz, California. In 2017,

due to…