Sarah-jane Parker

Good Law
United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 202214-44083California1,360 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

In re: SARAH-JANE PARKER, No. 21-15746

Debtor, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-02588-YGR ______________________________

LAURENCE JENNINGS; RAJ PATEL, MEMORANDUM*

Appellants,

v.

SARAH-JANE PARKER,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 17, 2022** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: CLIFTON, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Appellants Raj Patel and Laurence Jennings appeal the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s imposition of damages under 11 U.S.C. § 362(k) resulting from a violation of the 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(6) automatic stay. Appellee- Debtor Sarah-jane Parker argues that the case is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.