Juan Flores v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 3, 202419-73089California514 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 3 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABISUK SINSAENG, AKA Apisuk Andy No. 18-72975 Sinsaeng, AKA Avisuk Andy Sinsaeng, Agency No. A037-571-413 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

JUAN FLORES, AKA Juan Flores, Jr., No. 19-73089

Petitioner, Agency No. A090-214-113

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

JOSE ROSAS-ARROYO, No. 20-70100

Petitioner, Agency No. A072-128-281

v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 11, 2022, as to Nos. 18-72975 and 19-73089 Submitted August 26, 2022, as to No. 20-70100** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and MOSKOWITZ,***…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.