People v. Boles CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 3, 2024G062789California550 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motoike, J.

DISCUSSION

Effective January 1, 2019, Senate Bill No. 1437 (2017–2018 Reg. Sess.) (Stats. 2018, ch. 1015; Senate Bill 1437) amended the felony murder rule and the natural and probable consequences doctrine as it relates to murder ‘“to ensure that murder liability is not imposed on a person who is not the actual killer, did not act with the intent to kill, or was not a major participant in the underlying felony who acted with reckless indifference to human life.”’ (People v. Lewis (2021) 11 Cal.5th 952, 959 (Lewis).) Senate Bill 1437 also created procedures “for convicted murderers who could not be convicted under the law as amended to retroactively seek relief.” (Lewis, at p. 957.) The Legislature subsequently extended relief to defendants convicted of attempted murder based on the natural and probable

3 consequences doctrine. (Sen. Bill No. 775 (2021–2022 Reg. Sess.); Stats. 2021, ch. 551, § 2.) The process begins when a defendant previously convicted of a qualifying offense files a petition pursuant to section 1172.6. Once a superior court receives the petition, it shall appoint counsel upon petitioner’s request. (§ 1172.6, subd. (b)(1)–(3).) The prosecutor must then file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.