Conda

Conda v. Xsolla CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 3, 2024B316369California2,834 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/3/24 Conda v. Xsolla CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

RHOTUNDA CONDA, B316369

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV41974) v.

XSOLLA (USA), INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard L. Fruin, Jr., Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. Tron & Tron, Lanny M. Tron and Terry L. Tron for Plaintiff and Appellant. Blank Rome, Dennis Ehling, and Caitlin Sanders for Defendant and Respondent.

___________________________ Plaintiff sued her former employer for retaliation in violation of the Federal Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Labor Code sections 98.6 and 1102.5, and related…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.