Marvin Vanegas Ortiz v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 202415-73791California1,176 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 5 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARVIN ALEXANDER VANEGAS No. 15-73791
ORTIZ,
Agency No. A094-173-505 Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 2, 2024**
Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Marvin Vanegas Ortiz seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
(BIA) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for
special rule cancellation of removal under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central
American Relief Act (“NACARA”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and we deny the petition for review.