Marvin Vanegas Ortiz v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 202415-73791California1,176 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARVIN ALEXANDER VANEGAS No. 15-73791

ORTIZ,

Agency No. A094-173-505 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 2, 2024**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Marvin Vanegas Ortiz seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(BIA) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for

special rule cancellation of removal under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central

American Relief Act (“NACARA”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and we deny the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.