United States v. Jorge Flores-Altamirano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 202422-50267California852 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50267

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:18-cr-00242-DMG-1 v.

JORGE LUIS FLORES-ALTAMIRANO,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, District Judge

Argued and Submitted June 12, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, CHRISTEN, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge VANDYKE.

Jorge Flores-Altamirano appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion to suppress evidence seized by Immigration and Customs Enforcement

(ICE) officers pursuant to an immigration arrest. Because the parties are familiar

with the facts, we do not recount them here. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s decision on a motion to

suppress, see United States v. Malik, 963 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.