Mark Coonrod v. Columbus McKinnon Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 202423-35215California1,806 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK COONROD, an individual, No. 23-35215

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01530-AR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COLUMBUS MCKINNON

CORPORATION, a foreign business corporation,

Defendant-Appellee,

v.

KONECRANES, INC., a foreign business corporation,

Defendant-third-party- plaintiff-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Jeffrey Armistead, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 4, 2024 Portland, Oregon

Before: OWENS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and RAYES,** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Appellant Mark Coonrod worked as a welder fitter for Pierce Pacific

Manufacturing (“Pierce”). His job required him to use a crane equipped with a

hoist and mounting hook to move heavy parts onto his workstation. Coonrod was

injured on July 13, 2016, after the hoist came loose from its mounting hook and

struck…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.