Drake Shelton v. Ur Jaddou

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 202423-15965California1,069 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DRAKE ALDEN SHELTON, No. 23-15965

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00175-JAD-NJK v.

UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Director of MEMORANDUM* United States Citizenship and Immigration Services,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 2, 2024**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Pro se plaintiff-appellant Drake Alden Shelton (“Shelton”) appeals from the

district court’s dismissal, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, of his civil action

against Ur Mendoza Jaddou (“Jaddou”), the Director of United States Citizenship

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and Immigration Services (“USCIS”). He also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.