Chen

Chen v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 202422-449California671 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIN CHEN, No. 22-449 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-996-600 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 2, 2024**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Min Chen (“Chen”), a native and citizen of China, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA’s”) decision dismissing

Chen’s appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ’s”) denial of his application for

asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). As the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here. “Our

review is limited to the BIA’s decision,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.