Stefan

Stefan v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 202423-1540California535 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARINELA STEFAN; COSTINEL No. 23-1540 TURCAN; ROMEO-RONALDO Agency Nos.

STEFAN; FRANCESCA A205-706-226

STEFAN; MARIA-LOREDANA A205-602-555

DUMITRESCU,

A205-602-558

A205-602-559

Petitioners, A205-706-227 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 2, 2024**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners, a family of Romanian citizens, petition pro se for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing their asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (“CAT”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.