Datilus

Datilus v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 202423-180California934 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GESTON DATILUS, No. 23-180

Petitioner, Agency No. A209-386-173

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 2, 2024**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Geston Datilus, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review the decision

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the Immigration Judge’s

(“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(a). We deny the petition.

1. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.