Alvarez-Munoz

Alvarez-Munoz v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 202422-1355California824 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDIA BELEN ALVAREZ-MUNOZ, No. 22-1355 Agency No. Petitioner, A209-138-895 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 2, 2024**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Edia Alvarez-Munoz (“Alvarez-Munoz”), a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration of Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision

dismissing her appeal of the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. “We review only the BIA’s decision except to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.