Rojas Refugio v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 202423-2707California730 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN ROJAS REFUGIO; ERIKA No. 23-2707 RIOS GONZALEZ; DULCE MARIA Agency Nos.

ROJAS RIOS, A095-804-643

A074-788-389

Petitioners,

A215-817-431

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 2, 2024**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Martin Rojas Refugio (husband), Erika Rios Gonzalez (wife), and Dulce

Maria Rojas Rios (daughter) (collectively “Petitioners”), natives and citizens of

Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying

their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.