Danielle Pranger v. Oregon State University
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIELLE PRANGER; GARRETT No. 23-35393 HARRIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00656-HZ
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY, a public body of the State of Oregon,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 3, 2024 Portland, Oregon
Before: RAWLINSON, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Danielle Pranger (Pranger) and Garrett Harris (Harris) appeal the district
court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Oregon State University (OSU) on
their breach of contract claim. Pranger and Harris also contend that the district
court abused its discretion when it denied their request for additional discovery.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. We have jurisdiction…