A. Anderson v. Miguel Cardona
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 202422-55328California952 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JUL 8 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
A. K. ANDERSON, No. 22-55328
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:20-cv-01824-VAP-SP v.
MIGUEL A. CARDONA, Secretary of MEMORANDUM* Education; SAN BERNARDINO
COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT;
STEVEN GORDON, Director, Department of Motor Vehicles; DOES, 1- 10, inclusive,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 8, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). A. K. Anderson appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal without
leave to amend of his federal and state law claims against San Bernardino