A. Anderson v. Miguel Cardona

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 202422-55328California952 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUL 8 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

A. K. ANDERSON, No. 22-55328

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:20-cv-01824-VAP-SP v.

MIGUEL A. CARDONA, Secretary of MEMORANDUM* Education; SAN BERNARDINO

COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT;

STEVEN GORDON, Director, Department of Motor Vehicles; DOES, 1- 10, inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 8, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). A. K. Anderson appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal without

leave to amend of his federal and state law claims against San Bernardino

Community College District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.