People v. Sedillo CA2/3
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
In 2009, a jury found Sedillo guilty of two counts of special circumstance murder (§§ 187, subd. (a), 190.2, subd. (a)(3) [multiple murder special circumstance] & (21) [murder committed by personally discharging firearm from vehicle at person outside vehicle with intent to inflict death special circumstance]; counts 1 & 2) and two counts of attempted murder (§§ 664, 187, subd. (a); counts 3 & 4). As to counts 1, 2, and 4, the jury found that Sedillo personally and intentionally discharged a firearm causing great bodily injury or death (§ 12022.53, subd. (d)). As relevant here, Sedillo’s sentence included two terms of life without parole.
1 All further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.
2 Such a hearing is sometimes referred to as a Franklin hearing.
2 In May 2022, Sedillo filed a writ of habeas corpus in which he requested a Franklin hearing. The trial court treated the writ as a request for a Franklin hearing. On March 30, 2023, the trial court issued an order finding that denying youth offender parole hearings to 18-to-25 year olds sentenced to life without parole did not violate the equal protection clause. The trial court therefore denied…