Miller v. Universal Music Publishing CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 8, 2024B325945California4,482 words

Opinion

Opinion

Adams, J.

Filed 7/8/24 Miller v. Universal Music Publishing CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

CARL L. MILLER, B325945

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20SMCV01886) v.

UNIVERSAL MUSIC PUBLISHING

Inc.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark A. Young, Judge. Affirmed. Carl L. Miller, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Ballard Spahr, Robert S. Gutierrez and Elizabeth Schilken for Defendant and Respondent.

‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Carl L. Miller filed suit against Universal Music Publishing, Inc. (UMP), sued as Universal Music Publishing Group (UMPG),1 asserting breach of contract and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.