David Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection

Good Law
107 F.4th 882
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 202419-55616California6,721 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID CASSIRER; THE ESTATE No. 19-55616

OF AVA CASSIRER; UNITED

JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN D.C. No. DIEGO COUNTY, a California non- 2:05-cv-03459- profit corporation, JFW-E

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

ORDER

v.

THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA

COLLECTION FOUNDATION, an agency or instrumentality of the Kingdom of Spain,

Defendant-Appellee.

Filed July 9, 2024

Consuelo M. Callahan, Carlos T. Bea, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

Order; Statement by Judge Graber CASSIRER V. THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA COLLECTION FOUND.

SUMMARY *

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

The panel filed an order denying a petition for panel rehearing and denying a petition for rehearing en banc in a case in which the panel affirmed the district court’s judgment in favor of the Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection, an instrumentality of the Kingdom of Spain, in an action under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act seeking the return of a Pissarro painting stolen by the Nazis in 1939 Germany. Respecting the denial of rehearing en banc, Judge Graber, joined by Judge Paez, wrote that she…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.