People v. Ramirez CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 9, 2024E077359ACalifornia8,805 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant, Pedro Paredes Ramirez, was convicted of nine offenses arising out of

six different incidents involving different victims. These offenses included three counts

of committing a lewd act on a child under the age of 14 years (Pen. Code,1 § 288,

subd. (a); counts 2, 3, 7); one count of committing a lewd act on a child under the age of

14 years by means of force, violence, duress, or menace (§ 288, subd. (b)(1); count 9);

and one count of first degree burglary of an inhabited dwelling house (§§ 459, 462, subd.

(a); count 4). The jury also found true special circumstance allegations pursuant to

section 667.61 (one strike law) that counts 2, 3, 7, and 9 were committed during the

commission of a burglary (§ 667.61, subd. (e)(2)), as well as during the commission of a

first degree burglary with the intent to commit a specified sex offense against a victim

under the age of 14 years (§ 667.61, subds. (c), (d)(4)). Defendant’s sentence included a

term of life in prison without the possibility of parole pursuant to section 667.61,

subdivision (j)(1), on count 9; three terms of 25 years to life pursuant to section 667.61,

subdivision (j)(2), on counts 2,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.