In re K.C. CA2/4

background because our opinion is unpublished and the parties are familiar with the facts of the case and its procedural history. (People v. Garcia (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 847, 851 [unpublished opinion merely reviewing correctness of trial court’s decision “does not merit extensive factual or legal statement”].) Undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.

2 Mother acknowledges that she was not consistent about taking K. to follow-up visits and other appointments. Mother acknowledges, for example, that according to Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA), as of June 2022 K. had missed 19 of her 33 scheduled follow-up appointments. In October 2022, a social worker and a public health nurse at CHLA reported that K. was “medically stable,” but “Mother still continues to be tardy, re- schedules multiple times, or make unannounced . . . clinic visits.” At the end of November 2022, a CHLA social worker noted that since June 28, K. “had approximately 75 Physical Therapy AND Occupational Therapy appointments scheduled at CHLA. Only 4 have been attended. The rest were cancelled, rescheduled or no shows.” The social worker also stated, “The current primary…