Mirando

United States v. Mirando

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 202423-338California567 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUL 10 2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-338 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:16-cr-00215-PA-1 v.

MICHAEL MIRANDO, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 8, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and LIBURDI, District Judge.***

Michael Mirando appeals from the district court’s denial of a stipulation by

and between Mirando and the government requesting the district court to modify

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael T. Liburdi, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Mirando’s terms of supervised release by striking…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.