Dolores Bautista Martin v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 202418-73403California1,324 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DOLORES BAUTISTA MARTIN, No. 18-73403

Petitioner, Agency No. A209-162-571

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 8, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: CLIFTON, FISHER,*** and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Dolores Bautista Martin petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA’s) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. AR P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable D. Michael Fisher, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation. removal, and protection under the United Nations Convention Against Torture

(CAT) on her own behalf and on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.