Carrillo De Matias v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 202423-3186California760 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JACINTA CARRILLO DE No. 23-3186 MATIAS; DENIS OMAR MATIAS- Agency Nos.

CARRILLO; JONATHAN ALEXANDER A220-489-680A220-489-681A220-

MATIAS-CARRILLO; LEIDY MATIAS- 489-682A220-589-683

CARRILLO,

MEMORANDUM*

Petitioners,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 8, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jacinta Carrillo De Matias and her three children seek review of a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the Immigration

Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.