United States v. Ramon Palacios
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 202422-50263California724 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50263
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:20-cr-01434-LAB-1 v.
RAMON HUMBERTO PALACIOS, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 10, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: WARDLAW, CHRISTEN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
Ramon Palacios appeals his convictions for importing THC, conspiracy to
import THC, and smuggling goods into the United States. Because the parties are
familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here. We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
We review Palacios’s Confrontation Clause challenge for plain error because
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. he did not object to the challenged testimony on Confrontation Clause…