People v. Anguiano CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 10, 2024A166206California6,909 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/10/24 P. v. Anguiano CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A166206

v. JORGE HUMBERTO ANGUIANO, (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. 05001512474) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Jorge Humberto Anguiano pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter with a firearm enhancement in 2017. In appealing the trial court’s denial of his recent petition for resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.95,1 defendant makes three contentions: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the resentencing court’s finding beyond a reasonable doubt that he is guilty of murder under the current law; (2) the court improperly relied on inadmissible evidence; and (3) the court failed to

All further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.