O'Neill

O'Neill v. Cara CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 10, 2024G062076California1,840 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sanchez, J.

FACTS

Foreclosure of Plaintiff’s Home Plaintiff’s home in San Clemente was subject to a first deed of trust owned by Wells Fargo, N.A., and a second deed of trust owned by William Kevin O’Bryon. The first deed of trust had a principal balance of

2 1 $482,653.93. The second deed of trust had a principal balance of $91,668. It is undisputed plaintiff had the ability to cure any default regarding the second deed of trust. In February 2018, plaintiff retained defendants as her attorneys in connection with a pending foreclosure sale of her home by O’Bryon. Defendants’ efforts were ultimately unsuccessful, and plaintiff’s home was sold at a foreclosure auction for $437,000 in July 2018. In addition to paying $437,000, the purchaser was subject to liability for $482,653.93, the remaining balance on the first deed of trust. The proceeds of the $437,000 sale’s price were distributed as follows: (1) $113,581.95 was paid to O’Bryon in satisfaction of the second deed of trust and for costs of the foreclosure; and (2) $323,418.05 of the surplus (i.e., overbid) proceeds was paid to plaintiff.

The Complaint In August 2019, plaintiff filed the operative complaint alleging claims for legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.