Zachary Rosenbaum v. City of San Jose
107 F.4th 919
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 202422-16863California3,331 words
Opinion
Opinion
SANCHEZ, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ZACHARY ROSENBAUM, No. 22-16863
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:20-cv- v. 04777-NC
CITY OF SAN JOSE; BRET
HATZENBUHLER, SAN JOSE OPINION
POLICE DEPARTMENT
SERGEANT; HYMEL DUNN,
RYAN FERGUSON, FRANCISCO
VALLEJO, GARY ANDERSON,
SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT
OFFICERS,
Defendants-Appellants,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Nathanael M. Cousins, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 8, 2024 San Francisco, California
Filed July 11, 2024
Before: Ryan D. Nelson, Danielle J. Forrest, and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Sanchez SUMMARY *
Excessive Force/Qualified Immunity/Police Dogs
The panel affirmed the district court’s denial of qualified immunity to City of San Jose police officers in an action alleging that the officers used excessive force when they deployed a police dog that allegedly bit plaintiff Zachary Rosenbaum for more than twenty seconds after he had surrendered and lay prone on his…