Cortez-Reynoso

Cortez-Reynoso v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 202423-2636California698 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 11 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA GUADALUPE CORTEZ- No. 23-2636 REYNOSO; AXEL EFRAIN CHAVEZ- Agency Nos.

CORTEZ, A215-564-917

A215-564-918

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 9, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, N.R. SMITH, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Maria Guadalupe Cortez-Reynoso, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention against Torture (“CAT”).1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.