Blog

California case law updates, legal research guides, and product news.

All 42 u.s.c. § 1983 administrative exhaustion appeals process appellate procedure article iii standing asylum bankruptcy law california appellate decisions california appellate procedure california case law california law california supreme court civil commitment civil contempt civil forfeiture civil procedure civil rights commitment proceedings constitutional law constitutional rights covid-19 creditor rights criminal law criminal procedure cross-jurisdictional issues cryptocurrency deed delivery deliberate indifference drug offenses due process eighth amendment elder abuse emotional distress equal protection equitable tolling estate law false pretenses faretta rights federal jurisdiction financial hardship fraud fraudulent transfers gang enhancements governmental inaction habeas corpus health and safety code housing law immigration law insolvency intent to convey interstate detainers investment schemes judicial discretion judicial notice jurisdiction jury misconduct jury selection juvenile justice land disputes land use law landlord-tenant law lgbtq rights mental incompetency mentally disordered prisoners act ninth circuit ninth circuit decisions nondischargeable debt parole supervision personal injury precommitment credits prison conditions prison litigation pro se litigation probate court property disputes property law quiet title real estate contracts rent control retroactive application self-representation sentencing sexually violent predators statutory interpretation subject matter jurisdiction summary judgment survey errors tax law trial procedure trust deeds voir dire withholding of removal wrongful death

Case Law UpdatesOctober 1, 2026

The $400,000 Investment Mirage: How False Pretenses Can Render Debts Nondischargeable

In a high-stakes investment scheme, the court found that misleading conduct and omissions by Jose Robert Del Valle constituted false pretenses, rendering his debt to Cynthia Daniel nondischargeable. This case is pivotal for understanding when a debtor's misleading conduct can prevent discharge under bankruptcy law.