Blog

California case law updates, legal research guides, and product news.

All 42 u.s.c. § 1983 administrative exhaustion appeals process appellate procedure article iii standing asylum bankruptcy law california appellate decisions california appellate procedure california case law california law california supreme court civil commitment civil contempt civil forfeiture civil procedure civil rights commitment proceedings constitutional law constitutional rights covid-19 creditor rights criminal law criminal procedure cross-jurisdictional issues cryptocurrency deed delivery deliberate indifference drug offenses due process eighth amendment elder abuse emotional distress equal protection equitable tolling estate law false pretenses faretta rights federal jurisdiction financial hardship fraud fraudulent transfers gang enhancements governmental inaction habeas corpus health and safety code housing law immigration law insolvency intent to convey interstate detainers investment schemes judicial discretion judicial notice jurisdiction jury misconduct jury selection juvenile justice land disputes land use law landlord-tenant law lgbtq rights mental incompetency mentally disordered prisoners act ninth circuit ninth circuit decisions nondischargeable debt parole supervision personal injury precommitment credits prison conditions prison litigation pro se litigation probate court property disputes property law quiet title real estate contracts rent control retroactive application self-representation sentencing sexually violent predators statutory interpretation subject matter jurisdiction summary judgment survey errors tax law trial procedure trust deeds voir dire withholding of removal wrongful death

Case Law UpdatesSeptember 23, 2026

Unraveling Fraudulent Transfers: The High-Stakes Battle in Scholle v. Finnell

Scholle v. Finnell delves into the intricate world of fraudulent transfers, where the court scrutinized the legitimacy of property conveyances amidst a debtor's insolvency. This case serves as a critical reference for understanding the evidentiary burden in claims of fraudulent intent.